From maintainers-request at octave dot org Wed Nov 17 09:16:41 2004
Subject: Re: int octave_value::numel (void) const;
From: David Bateman <David dot Bateman at motorola dot com>
To: "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>
Cc: maintainers at octave dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:13:18 +0100

According to John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu> (on 11/17/04):
> On 17-Nov-2004, David Bateman <David dot Bateman at motorola dot com> wrote:
> 
> | You also need the attached one line patch so that the "end" keyword 
> | will work correctly for types where numel() is not the same as
> | dims().numel()...
> 
> OK, I made this change and added the following comment:
> 
>   // We want numel = prod (size ()) here, so dont' use
>   // index_object->numel () as that may be different (it is
>   // the number of nonzero elements for sparse arrays).
> 
> Is that accurate?

Perfect :-)

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                David dot Bateman at motorola dot com
Motorola CRM                                 +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary